🔗 Share this article

Are your LinkedIn connections viewing you as a thought leader? Do numerous commenters applauding your insights on expanding your venture? Do recruiters making contact to explore opportunities?

If not, the explanation could be your gender.

The Experiment: Modifying Profile Gender for Better Visibility

Numerous women joined an organized LinkedIn experiment this week following viral posts suggested that switching their gender to "man" boosted their platform visibility.

Other testers modified their professional summaries to incorporate what they termed "bro-coded" terminology - adding action-focused business buzzwords like "drive", "revolutionize" and "accelerate". Anecdotally, their exposure also improved.

Systemic Preference Questions Raised

The improved metrics has led some to speculate whether an inherent gender bias in LinkedIn's algorithm prioritizes men who use professional networking terminology.

Like many large networking sites, LinkedIn employs an algorithm to decide which posts are shown to which users - promoting some while suppressing others.

Platform Response

In a recent blog post, LinkedIn acknowledged the phenomenon but claimed it does not consider "demographic information" when determining content distribution. Rather, the company explained that "numerous factors" affect how posts are received.

Changing gender on your profile does not affect how your content appears in search or feed.

Individual Results

Simone Bonnett, who modified her pronouns to "he/him" and her profile name to "a masculine version", described remarkable outcomes.

"The statistics I'm seeing show a sixteen-fold rise in profile views and a 1,300% increase in impressions," she noted.

Another professional, a marketing expert, began experimenting after noticing her reach decline significantly.

The Process

• Initially, she modified her gender to "man"
• Subsequently, she used AI tools to rephrase her profile using "male-coded" wording
• Finally, she repurposed previous content with comparable "agentic" style

The outcome was immediate: a 415% increase in reach within one week.

The Downside

Although the success, Cornish voiced unhappiness with the approach.

"Before, my content were more personal - concise and insightful, but also friendly and relatable," she explained. "Currently, the bro-coded version was forceful and confident - similar to a white male swaggering around."

She abandoned the test after seven days, stating "Each day I continued, and outcomes got better, I became angrier."

Varying Outcomes

Some testers encountered positive outcomes. Cass Cooper who changed both her gender to "man" and her race to "Caucasian" described a reduction in reach and interaction.

"We understand there's algorithmic bias, but it's very challenging to comprehend how it functions in specific cases or the reasons behind it," she remarked.

Wider Consequences

These tests occur alongside ongoing conversations about LinkedIn's distinctive role as both a business platform and social space.

Platform modifications in recent months have apparently caused women professionals experiencing significantly reduced visibility, resulting in unofficial tests where the same posts by male and female users received vastly different audience engagement.

System Details

According to LinkedIn, the network uses AI systems to classify and distribute content based on various elements, including post content and the user's professional identity.

The company claims it regularly evaluates its algorithms, including "checks for gender-related disparities."

A spokesperson suggested that recent declines in certain members' visibility might originate from increased competition due to more content on the network.

Evolving Environment

As one participant noted, "bro-coding" appears to be increasing on the network.

"People often view LinkedIn as more professional and refined," she remarked. "This is evolving. It's turning into increasingly competitive and unpredictable."